Connect with us

Editorial

SUS, what are you doing?

Published

on

The Student Union Society (SUS) freed $80,000–$110,000 in annual expenses for themselves by quashing the Canoe. In its first year, the Canoe ran a $79,500 deficit; year two, a $113,571 deficit; year three had a $88,297 projected deficit.

Where will the money now go?

SUS president, Gurvir Gill, said they’ve reallocated the funds to hiring a front desk assistant and an events coordinator, but also towards the shuttle bus.

But the shuttle bus is funded by the Inter-Campus Shuttle Bus fee — a student fee that goes into the pool of approximately $3.5 million per year of “earmarked” funds that disappear without breakdowns. These are collected from the various SUS fees outside of what contributes to the operational budget, and it’s very frequently left out of budget conversations.

At the 10-month-late budget presentation in February 2018, the SUS talked about the challenges they faced keeping the Canoe afloat. In plain language, they couldn’t balance the cost of food with the price they sold it at, especially with a 49 per cent cost of goods.

The reality: students didn’t want to buy food at the rate the SUS chose to sell it at. But that doesn’t mean the restaurant isn’t viable. (A properly run restaurant typically only needs a 25–35 per cent cost of goods to run with a healthy profit. Casual dining shouldn’t be above mid 20s.)

The SUS stated that they’ll offer the Canoe’s space to a franchise. So if they rent out the space, where will that income go? It certainly shouldn’t go into any SUS budget line without affecting student fees.

Students, you’re owed a refund, but don’t expect one.

The relationship that students have come to expect sees the SUS operating a restaurant. Obviously that’s not going to happen. But if a franchise decides the space is worth paying for, student fees should be reduced by an amount proportional to the restaurant’s rent.

In other news that demonstrates poor use of student money, the rave/concert planned for last Friday by the SUS would have cost about $20,000, which is kind of strange and obscene for a small show. Due to the last minute cancellation, the SUS still paid about 30 per cent, according to Gill.

With tickets going for $15, it would take 1,334 sales to break even. Naturally, the SUS is willing to fund events, but apparently not $19,000+ for the 50 or so students (SUS official numbers) who bought tickets. The SUS shut down their profitable Fair Grounds café for a full day to push ticket sales. Still no dice.

The SUS didn’t have the foresight to see that an on-campus rave wouldn’t sell. Clearly they don’t have any finger on the pulse of students. It raises the question: SUS, what are you doing?

From the current SUS executive team, students were promised a proper breakdown of SUS finances and an increased amount of better program offerings.

But within the last two years, the student union axed their agreement with the Cheam Leisure Centre, promising to build their own gym, in partnership with UFV, at the CEP campus. The “gym” is surplus equipment in old office space, and the funds have seemingly gone nowhere.

Additionally, the two rooms reserved for the Pride Centre and Gender Equality Centre remain dark; fixIT IT service, previously operated by the SUS, was shut down; and the most successful on-campus student event, Child’s Play, which was organized by, and brought in hundreds of, students, not to mention thousands of dollars for charity, was put to an end by the SUS.

From an onlooker perspective, the SUS’s big plans to rebrand and create a new experience for students have only been to cut programs. Is this the new image that the SUS is going for? Cut programs and sell promises?

Students aren’t interested in hype. They are interested in having their money used responsibly.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Sam

    September 12, 2018 at 8:08 pm

    I’m so happy that now I get to pay $400 dollars for a gym membership, I was wondering what I was going to do with that 2 days work of money for eating at the canoe.

    And thankfully they chased out those successful events like the child’s play charity so they could make room for that “Concert”, I’m sure that wouldn’t have been a flaming pile of trash.

    I can’t wait to see what they do with all this surplus money, hopefully they will try and get the bookstore moved downtown, or remove all windows from campus, oh I know! They can “temporarily” get rid of the campus connector while they come up with a new system that will work better. Whatever it is I’m sure they wont pocket any money at all for themselves.

    Gurvir Gill, you have ruined years of progress, and it will take twice as long to make it up again.

  2. Kevin McFarlane

    September 21, 2018 at 11:18 pm

    Don’t forget about the fact that there is no longer club space OR a student lounge upstairs in the building. The club space is being used for storage of …. something and the student space was just empty until the Pride center moved into the larger room. So basically I’m paying a $35 building fee for the privilege of sitting on some couches in the hallway.

  3. Kevin McFarlane

    September 21, 2018 at 11:27 pm

    Oh I almost forgot, I was part of the Childs Play Planning Committee and to cut a long story short it didn’t happen because SUS tried to force us to raise money for one of their charities instead. I guess they saw one of the most successful charity events on campus (that raised money for children in hospitals) and decided that they didn’t just want a piece, they wanted the whole pie.

  4. Walter

    September 22, 2018 at 3:23 pm

    I’m so happy I’m no longer a student.

    Let’s add in the referendums where SUS sneaked stuff through by bundling the votes together, which is specifically not allowed.

    The Langley campus connector and the IT thing should have never happened in the first place. The voting for those two referendums was bundled with a more popular referendum: expansion of the chilliwack campus connector. Expanding the Chilliwack campus connectelor didn’t even pass on it’s own.

    SUS decided to force student to vote for all three referendums on the same form, then added a ‘no opinion’ option. The ‘no opinion’ option was then counted to get all three referendums over the minimum vote count. In reality about 10 to 20 people voted for the IT thing and the Langley bus.

    This is the type of behaviour that’s become expected of SUS and it’s maddening.

    SUS does what SUS wants. It doesn’t matter what students want or need. Who can trust SUS when they can’t even be bothered to follow the rules.

    If it’s the person who wants something counting the votes, they are going to get it and students will pay for it.

    Every student is just counting down to days until they are not paying for things no one wants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Receive The Cascade’s Newsletter